Choices, Games & Branching Paths

The Selves I Might Have Been

Also called: Counterfactual thinking

  • Personal interest
  • Observed in experiments
  • Personal metaphor
  • Working interpretation

I wonder about the versions of me who made different choices. Imagining them can make regret, gratitude and ambition clearer, without assuming those other versions physically exist.

What can an imagined other version of me teach me about the life I am actually living?

The idea

Imagining a different version of my life is a normal mental tool. Psychologists call it counterfactual thinking. Picturing how things could have gone better can sting, but it points to what to change. Picturing how things could have gone worse can bring relief and gratitude. Both are acts of imagination, not records of anything that happened.

Why it attracts me

I picture several futures growing out of each choice (Mapping the Futures a Choice Opens), so I also picture the pasts that did not happen. An imagined self who chose a different field, or said yes instead of no, can show me what I still want. That self also tests what "me" even means. Which traits would carry across every version (What Makes Me Still Me)?

An example

Imagine replaying one ordinary Saturday with a single change: accepting an invitation instead of declining it. Playing out that version honestly, with its costs as well as its gains, often teaches less about the road not taken than about what is missing on the road I am on. Engineers do something similar with computer models of a factory, testing alternative histories without claiming they happened (Digital Copies for Testing What-Ifs).

What I think (and don't know)

I find these imagined selves useful, and I try not to make them more than they are. They are not evidence of other worlds, even though branching-world ideas in physics (The Many-Worlds Reading of Quantum Physics) use similar pictures. I do not yet know where healthy reflection ends and endless brooding begins.

What this does not establish

Imagining other versions of myself does not show that they exist anywhere. Many-worlds ideas in physics do not turn my imagined selves into real people, and imagined pasts are not memories.

Questions I'm still exploring

  • When does imagining another path help me learn, and when does it just feed regret?
  • Which imagined self do I envy, and what does that reveal about what I want now?
  • What stays the same in me across all the versions I can imagine?

Sources and further reading

  • Neal J. Roese, "Counterfactual Thinking," Psychological Bulletin 121(1): 133–148 (1997)

Working interpretation: drafted from my notes and interests for review. It is not a direct quotation, and I may still change it.