Mind & Awareness

Thinking About My Own Thinking

Also called: metacognition

  • Personal interest
  • Observed in experiments
  • Working interpretation

Thinking about how I think helps me catch mistakes, biases and habits before they take over what I do. I want looking at myself to stay useful, rather than turning into endless self-analysis.

How can I tell when reflecting has turned into replaying the same worry over and over?

The idea

Metacognition is a second layer of thinking that watches the first. It asks: How sure am I? What am I assuming? Is this a pattern I have seen go wrong before? It does not need to be elaborate. Often it is one question asked at the right moment.

What I think (and don't know)

I believe this habit is worth building, and I also think it has limits. Much of what drives me happens below awareness (The Mind Working Below Awareness), and people are often confident about reasons that did not actually move them. So self-observation works best when it meets something outside my own head: a result, a measurement, another person's view. That is why it pairs with feedback (Growth Through Feedback). Mindfulness (Mindfulness and Being Present) offers a different route: noticing thoughts as they arise, instead of only analyzing them afterward.

An example

Steady, one of my side projects, builds this into short exercises. One skill, "Choose your next response," asks you to write "I am noticing the thought that…" followed by one small action you choose. Its question is: "What response is available even while the thought remains?" I like that it does not try to win an argument with the thought. It creates just enough distance to act.

Where it connects

Thinking about my own thinking is the inward version of knowing the limits of what I know (Knowing the Limits of What I Know). Both start from the same admission: my first answer might be wrong.

What this does not establish

Thinking about my thinking can help me catch some mistakes. It does not give me full access to my own mind: much of what drives me stays out of view, and confidence in my self-insight is not proof that it is accurate.

Questions I'm still exploring

  • What is the simplest check that tells me I might be wrong?
  • Why is it easier to spot errors in other people's thinking than in my own?
  • What turns a moment of reflection into a useful next action?

Sources and further reading

  • John H. Flavell (1979), "Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry", American Psychologist 34(10) — The paper that made metacognition a widely used term in psychology.

Working interpretation: drafted from my notes and interests for review. It is not a direct quotation, and I may still change it.